The article “Killer Culture”, by
David Kupelian, discusses how popular culture has taken over the media and is
corrupting the minds of youth society. David discusses about how certain
aspects of popular culture like MTV have a huge negative aspect on society.
Everything that MTV displays on their channel is a commercial in an attempt to
sell the viewer something. MTV consists of music television videos, sponsors,
advertisements, and much more all with the sole purpose to get into the viewers
head. Today’s youth society has drastically changed from the youth society of
the previous decades. Across the nation, there are teenagers in rebellion
because of not being loved absolutely, for “children deserve and desperately
need firmness, patience, fairness, limits, kindness, insight, and a good,
non-hypocritical example” (Kupelian). These are the traits that every parent
should possess and without these traits, a child may rebel and everything they
were taught to dislike to maintain the right path may eventually seem
attractive to them. This includes body piercings, tattoos, and meaningless sex
with countless individuals. For a parent this is a gruesome nightmare, but in
the mind of Kupelian, it is all the parents’ responsibility.
I believe Kupelian is correct in the
sense that if a parent does not act in the way a good parent should, it could
have very negative effects on the child. Without a parent to justify between
what is right and wrong would lead to complete and utter chaos in a child’s
life. However, too much parenting or over-protection can also lead to the same
disastrous outcome. Parents need to guide their children toward the right path
and control the atmosphere in which they live and learn in, but to try to
control one’s child will never end in the way that parent wants. Many parents
blame social media on why their child is so nasty, but many parents forget
about parent control. It is very hard to uncorrupt a child who has been exposed
to popular media, but if one were to simply block channels on the television
that they found unsuitable for their child, there would be a huge disaster
averted. Many parents just let their children surf the web and scroll through
the television, but the Internet can be a terrible place. If a child is
pre-exposed to adult content the psychological effects can be quite damaging.
The ideal situation would be not to expose a child to the vast and disturbing
ways of the Internet until their brains have matured enough to where they can
understand and comprehend what they see. By doing this, these children will not
become corrupted or addicted to the Internet and will live more “normal” lives,
spending more time outside and free. It is only fair to a child that they be
raised in a suitable atmosphere where they can grow and educate in a healthy
environment not infested with popular culture.
Interesting reading here. Thank you. I really like how your summary includes Kupelian's emphasis on the role of parents. This is an important aspect of his argument that can easily get lost on an audience who is distracted by Kupelian's description of the 'horror' (his opinion;not mine) of youth counter-culture. I also agree with the argument you make in the final paragraph, which connects to an important point you make in your excellent "change" post about bullying and both of these ideas could be developed into your formal paper, if you are interested in formulating an argument on this topic.
ReplyDelete